Growth Prediction
🎯 Chasing Sub-20
Consistency is strong, but improvement has stalled. Sub-optimal move efficiency or technique ceiling is likely limiting further AO100 drops.
Sub-30 → Sub-20
🧭 Typical at this level
- • Smooth Cross-to-F2L transition
- • Continuous solve flow
- • Reduced hesitation before the first pair
🎯 Recommended focus
- • Focus on fluid transitions rather than burst TPS
- • Eliminate the pause after finishing the cross
- • Drill F2L cases until automatic
~2,871
solves remaining
≈ 65 sessions at your current pace
Sub-25s
~123
solves to next milestone
≈ 3 sessions
Your improvement rate is the biggest variable. A slower rate dramatically increases the estimate even when the gap is smaller.
You're entering advanced-level gains. Progress naturally slows.
Estimate based on recent trends. More sessions improve accuracy.
Based on solve data as of Jun 7, 2026
Performance Trend & Forecast
AI Performance Insight
Your AO100 is 25.78s, but your stability is declining. A stddev of 5.259s that is worsening by 1.713s shows you are losing control over your solve variance. You are currently facing a structural plateau.
You must prioritize algorithm efficiency to resolve the efficiency_bottleneck. The 1.74s gap between your session average and AO100 shows you can hit fast times, but you lack the efficiency to make them your norm. Reducing move count will stabilize your floor.
Complete 20 slow-turn solves per session where you forbid any pauses between steps.
Spend 15 minutes daily drilling your slowest PLL algorithms until the finger tricks are subconscious.
This targets the recognition lag causing your variance.
Your session average of 24.04s proves you have the raw speed to maintain a sub-25 average. The capacity is already there.
A worsening consistency trend of 1.713s is your biggest threat. Without stabilizing your stddev, your average will stagnate despite occasional fast solves.
No data yet
Upload a csTimer session via the admin panel to get started.