Milestones
Performance Over Time
Latest 20 Solves
Click a dot to see scramble
Daily AO12
Daily AO100 & Mean
Smart Cube
Per-phase splits, TPS & reconstructions captured from a smart cube
Recent solves60
Where to Focus
Based on 60 smart-cube solves · vs your goal pace
You average 8.3s on F2L but need ~5.0s to hit your goal, about 3.3s to gain. Both lookahead and turn speed are slowing it down.
Why this? ▾Hide ▴
F2L is 3.3s behind your goal pace, 3.3s of the 4.8s on the table across all four steps (69%).
- Lookahead pauses ~2.1s vs a ~0.5s goal-pace target (1.6s over).
- Turning ~6.3s vs ~4.5s (1.8s over).
Targets are your goal tier's pace for each step, from 60 smart-cube solves.
You average 2.7s on PLL but need ~1.7s to hit your goal, about 1.0s to gain. Turn speed is the limiter, not alg recognition.
Why this? ▾Hide ▴
PLL is 1.0s behind your goal pace, 1.0s of the 4.8s on the table across all four steps (22%).
- Alg recognition pauses ~0.6s vs a ~0.5s goal-pace target (0.1s over).
- Turning ~2.0s vs ~1.2s (0.8s over).
Targets are your goal tier's pace for each step, from 60 smart-cube solves.
How each step compares to your goal pace
Your cross and first pair together average 3.6s versus ~2.2s for your goal. A slow cross-to-first-pair transition. Tracking the first pair during your cross, or planning it in inspection, would close most of this.
This overlaps Cross and F2L above, so read it on its own rather than added to those bars.
Where Your Time Goes Over Time
Stacked solve time by phase. Total height is your full solve, so a shrinking stack means you're getting faster.
Each point is the median of up to 25 consecutive solves, dated by the block's last solve, not a daily average.
Monthly Stats
Includes historical & solve-based data
Growth Prediction
🎯 Chasing Sub-10
Recognition and execution are aligned within the expected range. Improvement here comes from technique refinement rather than raw speed development.
Sub-15 → Sub-10
🧭 Typical at this level
- • Strong F2L look-ahead
- • Low-rotation solving
- • Consistent Full PLL
- • Cross occasionally planned with +1
🎯 Recommended focus
- • Eliminate all visible pauses during F2L
- • Track the next pair before finishing the current insertion
- • Reduce rotation count
~128,898
solves remaining
≈ 774 sessions at your current pace
Sub-14s
~2,731
solves to next milestone
≈ 16 sessions
Your improvement rate is the biggest variable. A slower rate dramatically increases the estimate even when the gap is smaller.
You're entering advanced-level gains. Progress naturally slows.
Forecast will stabilize with more sessions.
Based on solve data as of Oct 13, 2026
Performance Trend & Forecast
AI Performance Insight
Your AO100 of 14.71s puts you in the sub-15 range, but your F2L is +3.15s over the target tier. This is the primary factor holding you back from sub-10. Your recent session average of 14.61s shows you are maintaining your current level.
You need to focus on F2L lookahead and turn speed to eliminate the +3.15s bottleneck. This is your largest measured deficit. Improving your transition between pairs will have the biggest impact on your overall average.
Complete 50 slow-turn solves per session where you never stop turning, focusing on tracking the next pair.
Follow this with 20 solves focusing on maximizing TPS for F2L pairs.
Use a metronome at 60 BPM to force a consistent rhythm.
Your 14-day improvement rate of -0.09 s/day shows a steady downward trend. This proves your volume of 816 solves per week is producing real results.
The estimated 128,898 solves to reach your target indicates your current progress rate is too slow. You risk a long plateau without a significant change in technique.