Milestones

First Sub-20 AO100

19.97s

Nov 6, 2026

Tap for scramble →

Best Single

13.70s

Nov 6, 2026

Tap for scramble →

Progress Dashboard

7 sessions tracked · 182 solves · 3x3 Speed Solving

Current AO12

18.34s

Last 12 solves

Current AO100

18.86s

Last 100 solves

Best Single

13.70s

All-time best

Progress to Goal18.86s / 18.00s
96% to sub-18

Performance Over Time

Latest 20 Solves

Click a dot to see scramble

Daily AO12

Daily AO100 & Mean

Monthly Stats

Includes historical & solve-based data

MonthBest SinglePeak AO12Closing AO100
November 2026Latest13.70s17.20s18.86s
October 202615.21s19.58s–
September 202614.37s20.32s–
August 202615.61s20.49s–

Growth Prediction

🎯 Chasing Sub-18

Stability Status
Efficiency Ceiling→
gap -0.9sbench 1.6–2.4s

Consistency is strong, but improvement has stalled. Sub-optimal move efficiency or technique ceiling is likely limiting further AO100 drops.

Phase

Sub-20 → Sub-15

Plateau

🧭 Typical at this level

  • • Full cross planning (4 pieces)
  • • Beginning Cross+1 inspection
  • • Basic look-ahead during F2L

🎯 Recommended focus

  • • Slow down turning to develop look-ahead
  • • Execute known F2L pairs "blindly"
  • • Minimize rotations during F2L
Sub-18s goal

~222

solves remaining

likely 147–550

≈ 6 sessions at your current pace

Why ~222 solves?
Gap to close19.0s → 18.0s = 1.0s
Your own trend~46(25.70ms/solve, 1d)
Cubers at your level~371(19 cubers)
Estimate~222 solves
Likely147–550

Set between your own trend and what cubers at your level needed for the same drop, and a little later than the plain middle, which tended to arrive early. About half of cubers like you land in the likely range.

You're entering advanced-level gains. Progress naturally slows.

More recent solves improve forecast accuracy.

high confidence

Cubers at your level and pace mostly land close to this.

Based on solve data as of Nov 6, 2026

Performance Trend & Forecast

AI Performance Insight

Performance Interpretation

You are averaging 18.98s, and your recent session data shows you are performing better with a -0.88s gap. Your consistency is improving by 0.862s, which shows your baseline is stabilizing. You are currently facing a structural plateau, meaning your current method of solving has reached its limit.

Primary Focus

You need to prioritize algorithm efficiency. The data explicitly identifies an efficiency bottleneck and efficiency limited issues. This means your move count is too high to reach sub-15, regardless of your turn speed.

Practice Strategy

Execute 50 slow-turn solves per session.

Focus on minimizing move count and optimizing finger tricks for every transition.

Do not worry about the timer, but ensure you are finding the most efficient solution for every case.

Mindset

You are only 222 estimated solves away from your target tier. Your consistency trend of 0.862s shows you are becoming a more reliable solver.

Risk

Your momentum is currently at a plateau. High volume alone will not fix a structural efficiency bottleneck.