Milestones
Performance Over Time
Latest 20 Solves
Click a dot to see scramble
Daily AO12
Daily AO100 & Mean
Smart Cube
Per-phase splits, TPS & reconstructions captured from a smart cube
Recent solves60
Where to Focus
Based on 60 smart-cube solves · vs your goal pace
You average 11.2s on F2L but need ~10.5s to hit your goal, about 0.7s to gain. Lookahead is the limiter, not turn speed.
Why this? ▾Hide ▴
F2L is 0.7s behind your goal pace, 0.7s of the 1.7s on the table across all four steps (42%).
- Lookahead pauses ~3.1s vs a ~2.0s goal-pace target (1.1s over).
- Turning ~7.6s vs ~8.5s (0.9s under).
Targets are your goal tier's pace for each step, from 60 smart-cube solves.
You average 2.9s on Cross but need ~2.2s to hit your goal, about 0.7s to gain. Turn speed is the limiter, not lookahead.
Why this? ▾Hide ▴
Cross is 0.7s behind your goal pace, 0.7s of the 1.7s on the table across all four steps (41%).
- Lookahead pauses ~0.0s vs a ~0.8s goal-pace target (0.8s under).
- Turning ~2.9s vs ~1.4s (1.5s over).
Targets are your goal tier's pace for each step, from 60 smart-cube solves.
How each step compares to your goal pace
Your cross and first pair together average 6.1s versus ~4.0s for your goal.
This overlaps Cross and F2L above, so read it on its own rather than added to those bars.
Where Your Time Goes Over Time
Stacked solve time by phase. Total height is your full solve, so a shrinking stack means you're getting faster.
Each point is the median of up to 25 consecutive solves, dated by the block's last solve, not a daily average.
Monthly Stats
Includes historical & solve-based data
Growth Prediction
🎯 Chasing Sub-20
Recognition and execution are aligned within the expected range. Improvement here comes from technique refinement rather than raw speed development.
Sub-30 → Sub-20
🧭 Typical at this level
- • Smooth Cross-to-F2L transition
- • Continuous solve flow
- • Reduced hesitation before the first pair
🎯 Recommended focus
- • Focus on fluid transitions rather than burst TPS
- • Eliminate the pause after finishing the cross
- • Drill F2L cases until automatic
~530
solves remaining
≈ 24 sessions at your current pace
Sub-21s
~134
solves to next milestone
≈ 6 sessions
Your improvement rate is the biggest variable. A slower rate dramatically increases the estimate even when the gap is smaller.
You're entering advanced-level gains. Progress naturally slows.
Estimate based on recent trends. More sessions improve accuracy.
Based on solve data as of Sep 15, 2026
Performance Trend & Forecast
AI Performance Insight
Your AO100 is 21.64s, but your 14-day improvement rate is -0.041342 s/day. This indicates a recent decline in performance. The primary bottleneck is your Cross+1, which is 2.14s over the target tier.
You must prioritize inspection planning and early lookahead. Your Cross+1 is +2.14s over target, which is your largest measured bottleneck. This shows you are not planning the first F2L pair during inspection.
Perform 20 solves per session of Cross+1 drills.
Spend the full 15 seconds of inspection planning both the cross and the first pair, then execute only those two steps.
This trains your ability to track pieces before the solve starts.
Your consistency is improving by 6.317s. This means your solves are becoming more predictable, which is the necessary foundation for breaking into sub-20.
Your volume of 55 solves per week is too low. At this rate, it will take you over 10 weeks to reach the estimated 530 solves needed for your target.