Milestones

First Sub-20 AO100

19.97s

Oct 7, 2026

Tap for scramble →

1,000 Solves

1,000 solves

Oct 16, 2026

Best Single

12.40s

Oct 18, 2026

Tap for scramble →

Progress Dashboard

53 sessions tracked · 1379 solves · 3x3 Speed Solving

Current AO12

19.06s

Last 12 solves

Current AO100

19.66s

Last 100 solves

Best Single

12.40s

All-time best

Progress to Goal19.66s / 19.00s
97% to sub-19

Performance Over Time

Latest 20 Solves

Click a dot to see scramble

Daily AO12

Daily AO100 & Mean

Smart Cube

Per-phase splits, TPS & reconstructions captured from a smart cube

Recent solves60

TimeMovesTPSDate

Where to Focus

Based on 60 smart-cube solves · vs your goal pace

CrossYour biggest time sink

You average 2.7s on Cross but need ~2.2s to hit your goal, about 0.5s to gain. Turn speed is the limiter, not lookahead.

Why this? ▾

Cross is 0.5s behind your goal pace, 0.5s of the 0.5s on the table across all four steps (100%).

  • Lookahead pauses ~0.0s vs a ~0.8s goal-pace target (0.8s under).
  • Turning ~2.7s vs ~1.4s (1.3s over).

Targets are your goal tier's pace for each step, from 60 smart-cube solves.

How each step compares to your goal pace

Cross
0.5s behind
F2L
0.5s ahead
OLL
0.1s ahead
PLL
0.1s ahead
Cross + first pair1.6s behind · one of the strongest predictors of overall speed

Your cross and first pair together average 5.7s versus ~4.0s for your goal.

This overlaps Cross and F2L above, so read it on its own rather than added to those bars.

Where Your Time Goes Over Time

Stacked solve time by phase. Total height is your full solve, so a shrinking stack means you're getting faster.

Each point is the median of up to 25 consecutive solves, dated by the block's last solve, not a daily average.

Monthly Stats

Includes historical & solve-based data

MonthBest SinglePeak AO12Closing AO100
November 2026Latest13.89s18.33s19.66s
October 202612.40s18.24s19.59s
September 202614.65s19.93s21.22s
August 202614.62s20.54s22.65s

Growth Prediction

🎯 Chasing Sub-19

Stability Status
Efficiency Ceiling→
gap 0.0sbench 1.6–2.4s14d -1.6ms/day

Consistency is strong, but improvement has stalled. Sub-optimal move efficiency or technique ceiling is likely limiting further AO100 drops.

Phase

Sub-20 → Sub-15

Plateau

🧭 Typical at this level

  • • Full cross planning (4 pieces)
  • • Beginning Cross+1 inspection
  • • Basic look-ahead during F2L

🎯 Recommended focus

  • • Slow down turning to develop look-ahead
  • • Execute known F2L pairs "blindly"
  • • Minimize rotations during F2L
Sub-19s goal

~490

solves remaining

likely 275–1,014

≈ 17 sessions at your current pace

Why ~490 solves?
Gap to close19.7s → 19.0s = 0.7s
Your own trend~494(1.51ms/solve, 60d)
Cubers at your level~168(19 cubers)
Estimate~490 solves
Likely275–1,014

Set between your own trend and what cubers at your level needed for the same drop, and a little later than the plain middle, which tended to arrive early. About half of cubers like you land in the likely range.

You're entering advanced-level gains. Progress naturally slows.

medium confidence

Cubers at your level vary, so read this as a rough guide.

Based on solve data as of Nov 6, 2026

Performance Trend & Forecast

AI Performance Insight

Performance Interpretation

Your AO100 of 19.66s shows you are hovering right at the sub-20 threshold. While your consistency is improving by 0.452s, your overall momentum has plateaued. You are stable, but structural efficiency is now the primary limiter.

Primary Focus

Your primary focus is inspection planning and early lookahead. Your Cross+1 is +1.65s over the target tier, which is a much larger gap than your turn speed on the cross. You must plan the first F2L pair during inspection to eliminate the pause after the cross.

Practice Strategy

Perform 30 solves per session of blind cross and first pair drills.

Inspect the cube until you can execute both without looking, then solve the rest of the cube at a slow, steady pace.

This trains your ability to plan ahead and reduces the +1.65s bottleneck.

Mindset

Your consistency trend is improving by 0.452s. This shows you have a stable foundation to build upon as you attack your efficiency bottlenecks.

Risk

Your 14-day improvement rate of -0.001636 s/day is nearly flat. You risk staying at this plateau if you do not shift from mindless solving to targeted efficiency drills.