Milestones
Performance Over Time
Latest 20 Solves
Click a dot to see scramble
Daily AO12
Daily AO100 & Mean
Monthly Stats
Includes historical & solve-based data
Growth Prediction
🎯 Chasing Sub-15
Recognition and execution are aligned within the expected range. Improvement here comes from technique refinement rather than raw speed development.
Sub-20 → Sub-15
🧭 Typical at this level
- • Full cross planning (4 pieces)
- • Beginning Cross+1 inspection
- • Basic look-ahead during F2L
🎯 Recommended focus
- • Slow down turning to develop look-ahead
- • Execute known F2L pairs "blindly"
- • Minimize rotations during F2L
~1,679
solves remaining
≈ 49 sessions at your current pace
Sub-16s
~239
solves to next milestone
≈ 7 sessions
Your improvement rate is the biggest variable. A slower rate dramatically increases the estimate even when the gap is smaller.
You're entering advanced-level gains. Progress naturally slows.
This estimate is based on stable long-term trends.
Based on solve data as of Jun 9, 2026
Performance Trend & Forecast
AI Performance Insight
Your AO100 of 17.25s shows you are comfortably sub-20, but your recent trend is regressing with a 14-day improvement rate of -0.025938 s/day. The 0.106s increase in your standard deviation indicates that your solves are becoming less predictable. You are currently fighting a trend of worsening consistency.
You need to prioritize recognition and lookahead to address the efficiency_limited label. Your standard deviation of 2.645s is too high for a sub-17 cuber, meaning you are likely pausing during transitions. Stabilizing your lookahead will reduce these gaps and stop the recent performance dip.
Complete 30 slow-turn solves per session focusing on zero-pause transitions to train lookahead.
Spend 15 minutes daily drilling your most inconsistent PLLs to lower your 2.645s standard deviation.
Focus specifically on the transition between F2L and OLL.
Your session average of 16.86s demonstrates that you can already perform at a sub-17 level. This number proves the speed is there, provided you can stabilize your consistency.
A volume of 55 solves per week is insufficient to sustain progress given your current negative improvement rate. You risk stagnating far short of the 1679 solves required to reach your target tier.