Milestones

First Sub-10 AO100

9.75s

Dec 14, 2025

Tap for scramble →

Best Single

5.30s

Jul 22, 2026

Tap for scramble →

8,000 Solves

8,000 solves

Jul 23, 2026

Progress Dashboard

68 sessions tracked · 8812 solves · 3x3 Speed Solving

Current AO12

9.96s

Last 12 solves

Current AO100

9.57s

Last 100 solves

Best Single

5.30s

All-time best

Progress to Goal9.57s / 9.00s
97% to sub-9

Performance Over Time

Latest 20 Solves

Click a dot to see scramble

Daily AO12

Daily AO100 & Mean

Monthly Stats

Includes historical & solve-based data

MonthBest SinglePeak AO12Closing AO100
July 2026Latest5.30s7.98s9.57s
June 20265.61s8.68s9.68s
April 20267.61s9.08s9.78s
March 20266.37s8.27s9.62s
February 20265.70s8.53s9.61s
January 20266.21s8.46s9.38s
December 20256.78s8.55s9.51s

Growth Prediction

🎯 Chasing Sub-9

Stability Status
Regression Risk
gap 0.5sbench 0.641.2s14d +5.7ms/day

AO100 is trending upward while inconsistency is also rising. Fatigue, overtraining, or technique regression are common causes.

Phase

Sub-10 → Sub-8

Regression Risk

🧭 Typical at this level

  • Consistent Full Cross+1 inspection
  • Efficient F2L (pseudo-slotting/keyhole)
  • Strong 1-look PLL recognition

🎯 Recommended focus

  • Improve Cross+1 success rate
  • Reduce move count in F2L
  • Eliminate micro-pauses through advanced look-ahead
Sub-9s goal

~29,660

solves remaining

229 sessions at your current pace

Why ~29,660 solves?
Gap to close9.6s → 9.0s = 0.6s
Improvement rate0.07ms / solve(60d, 3,000 solves)
Base estimate0.6s ÷ 0.07ms = 8,143
Difficulty scaling×3.642.5 wall included)
Estimate~29,660 solves

Your improvement rate is the biggest variable. A slower rate dramatically increases the estimate even when the gap is smaller.

You're entering advanced-level gains. Progress naturally slows.

high confidence

This estimate is based on stable long-term trends.

Based on solve data as of Aug 15, 2026

Performance Trend & Forecast

AI Performance Insight

Performance Interpretation

Your AO100 of 9.57s is being undermined by a 30-day improvement rate of -0.008895 s/day. Your consistency is also declining, with a standard deviation of 1.374s that has worsened by 0.128s. You are currently in a regression phase where efficiency is the primary bottleneck.

Primary Focus

You must prioritize efficiency over raw speed to resolve the efficiency_limited issue. The regression_risk in your data suggests that simply solving more will not work. You need to optimize your move count and recognition to lower your average.

Practice Strategy

Execute 50 slow-turn solves per session where you prioritize zero rotations and minimal pauses.

Track your move count for 10 solves and aim to reduce the total by 3 to 5 moves per solve.

This drill forces better recognition and more efficient solutions.

Mindset

Your 14-day improvement rate of 0.005718 s/day proves you are capable of positive growth. This recent uptick shows you can break the regression if you change your approach.

Risk

Your consistency is worsening by 0.128s, which signals an unstable solve pattern. This trend, combined with a regression_risk momentum, will prevent you from reaching the sub-8 tier.