Milestones
Performance Over Time
Latest 20 Solves
Click a dot to see scramble
Daily AO12
Daily AO100 & Mean
Smart Cube
Per-phase splits, TPS & reconstructions captured from a smart cube
Recent solves60
Where to Focus
Based on 60 smart-cube solves · vs your goal pace
You average 11.9s on F2L but need ~7.5s to hit your goal — about 4.4s to gain. Lookahead is the limiter, not turn speed.
Why this? ▾Hide ▴
F2L is 4.4s behind your goal pace — 4.4s of the 5.6s on the table across all four steps (78%).
- Lookahead pauses ~4.3s vs a ~1.0s goal-pace target (3.3s over).
- Turning ~7.1s vs ~6.5s (0.6s over).
Targets are your goal tier's pace for each step, from 60 smart-cube solves.
You average 3.4s on PLL but need ~2.6s to hit your goal — about 0.8s to gain. Turn speed is the limiter, not alg recognition.
Why this? ▾Hide ▴
PLL is 0.8s behind your goal pace — 0.8s of the 5.6s on the table across all four steps (13%).
- Alg recognition pauses ~0.7s vs a ~0.9s goal-pace target (0.2s under).
- Turning ~2.6s vs ~1.7s (0.9s over).
Targets are your goal tier's pace for each step, from 60 smart-cube solves.
How each step compares to your goal pace
Your cross and first pair together average 5.2s versus ~3.2s for your goal.
This overlaps Cross and F2L above — read it on its own, not added to those bars.
Where Your Time Goes Over Time
Stacked solve time by phase — total height is your full solve; a shrinking stack means you're getting faster.
Each point is the median of up to 18 consecutive solves, dated by the block's last solve — not a daily average.
Monthly Stats
Includes historical & solve-based data
Growth Prediction
🎯 Chasing Sub-15
Recognition and execution are aligned within the expected range. Improvement here comes from technique refinement rather than raw speed development.
Sub-20 → Sub-15
🧭 Typical at this level
- • Full cross planning (4 pieces)
- • Beginning Cross+1 inspection
- • Basic look-ahead during F2L
🎯 Recommended focus
- • Slow down turning to develop look-ahead
- • Execute known F2L pairs "blindly"
- • Minimize rotations during F2L
~29,352
solves remaining
≈ 352 sessions at your current pace
Sub-18s
~1,900
solves to next milestone
≈ 23 sessions
Your improvement rate is the biggest variable. A slower rate dramatically increases the estimate even when the gap is smaller.
You're entering advanced-level gains. Progress naturally slows.
This estimate is based on stable long-term trends.
Based on solve data as of Jul 30, 2026
Performance Trend & Forecast
AI Performance Insight
Your AO100 of 18.72s shows you are approaching the sub-15 tier, supported by a 14-day improvement rate of -0.07s per day. However, your F2L is 4.43s over the target tier, which is the primary factor keeping your average above 15 seconds.
You must prioritize F2L lookahead to address the 4.43s bottleneck. This is your most significant efficiency loss and far outweighs the 0.76s lag in your PLL turn speed.
Execute 50 slow-turn solves per session where the cube never stops moving to train lookahead.
Spend 30 minutes on Cross+1 drills to specifically target the 2.02s gap in your inspection and early solve planning.
Your momentum is accelerating and your consistency is improving by 0.645s, meaning your progress is becoming more stable.
The estimated 29,352 solves to reach your target suggests that your current volume of 607 solves per week is insufficient for rapid progress.
Solve Videos
Loading embed…