Progress Dashboard

82 sessions tracked · 9358 solves · 3x3 Speed Solving

Current AO12

8.92s

Last 12 solves

Current AO100

8.59s

Last 100 solves

Best Single

4.66s

All-time best

Progress to Goal8.59s / 8.50s
99% to sub-9

Performance Over Time

Latest 20 Solves

Click a dot to see scramble

Daily AO12

Daily AO100 & Mean

Monthly Stats

Includes historical & solve-based data

MonthBest SinglePeak AO12Closing AO100
April 2026Latest4.66s7.45s8.59s
March 20264.87s7.70s8.55s
February 20265.10s7.85s8.98s
January 20264.85s7.98s8.58s

Growth Prediction

🎯 Chasing Sub-8.5

Stability Status
Efficiency Ceiling
gap -0.3sbench 0.641.2s14d -4.3ms/day

Consistency is strong, but improvement has stalled. Sub-optimal move efficiency or technique ceiling is likely limiting further AO100 drops.

Phase

Sub-10 → Sub-8

Plateau

🧭 Typical at this level

  • Consistent Full Cross+1 inspection
  • Efficient F2L (pseudo-slotting/keyhole)
  • Strong 1-look PLL recognition

🎯 Recommended focus

  • Improve Cross+1 success rate
  • Reduce move count in F2L
  • Eliminate micro-pauses through advanced look-ahead
Sub-8.5s goal

~5,000

solves remaining

44 sessions at your current pace

But first:

Sub-8s

~5,000

solves to next milestone

44 sessions

Why ~5,000 solves?
Gap to close8.6s → 8.5s = 0.1s
Improvement rate0.05ms / solve(60d, 7,476 solves)
Base estimate0.1s ÷ 0.05ms = 1,869
Difficulty scaling×2.672.5 wall included)
Estimate~5,000 solves

Your improvement rate is the biggest variable. A slower rate dramatically increases the estimate even when the gap is smaller.

You're entering advanced-level gains. Progress naturally slows.

high confidence

This estimate is based on stable long-term trends.

Based on solve data as of Apr 17, 2026

Performance Trend & Forecast

AI Performance Insight

Performance Interpretation

Current performance is 8.59 seconds, which is 0.33 seconds below the target time. A decreasing standard deviation of 1.015s, down from the prior measurement by 0.136s, indicates improved consistency. However, the 30-day slope of -0.009864 s/day suggests a slowing rate of improvement compared to the 14-day slope of -0.004286 s/day.

Primary Focus

The ‘efficiency_bottleneck’ state, coupled with a ‘structural_plateau’, indicates that further time reduction requires optimizing execution rather than learning new algorithms. The current performance level is consistent with the goal tier, but the plateauing improvement rate suggests diminishing returns from current practice habits.

Practice Strategy

Implement a slow, deliberate practice routine focusing on look-ahead and fingertricks.

Perform 3 sets of 20 solves, each set targeting a specific aspect of execution, such as minimizing pauses or optimizing turning angles.

Record and analyze each set to identify and address recurring inefficiencies.

Mindset

The data indicates a stable performance level with a consistent solve time. While improvement is slowing, the reduction in solve standard deviation demonstrates effective consolidation of existing skills. Continued focused practice is likely to yield further, albeit incremental, gains.

Risk

The plateau in improvement rate, despite decreasing standard deviation, suggests a potential for stagnation. Ignoring the efficiency bottleneck could limit further progress towards the sub-8 second goal.